I found a link to vintagesnow.com and of course proceeded to the john deere section. here is the link:
http://www.vintagesnow.com/John_Deere.html
Now I am confused. The FAQ on JDsleds.com says to use the highest octane fuel in my 76' cyclone. has that recommendation been changed? It said on vintagesnow.com that 1975-1984, 88 octane or better.
Thanks,
Matt
octane question
-
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:00 am
- Real Name: Pat Scott
- Location: Southeast Pa.
octane question
Matt,
I don't know where he found his info that is posted, I would stick with the original recommendation of "high octane" for the 76 cyclone. The combustion chamber/porting was changed in 77 for the a lower octane gas.
I don't know where he found his info that is posted, I would stick with the original recommendation of "high octane" for the 76 cyclone. The combustion chamber/porting was changed in 77 for the a lower octane gas.
Last edited by harleysportster on Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
'76 440 cyclone
'76 440 liquifire
'78 440 Cyclone
'75 JDX8 (sold to a member here)
'78 Liquifire(CrossCountry Clone)
'80 Liquifire(sold)
'76 440 liquifire
'78 440 Cyclone
'75 JDX8 (sold to a member here)
'78 Liquifire(CrossCountry Clone)
'80 Liquifire(sold)
- WinnipegStPaul9
- Posts: 5577
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:00 am
- Real Name: Don Amber
- Location: Churubusco, IN
octane question
Octane ratings today are not the same as the octane ratings in the 70's. Can anyone remember when the change took place and if I'm not mistaken, ratings today are higher. It may have had something to do with removing lead from the gas in the 70's.
Feel free to check out our website www.buscobullet.com for restorations or parts.
-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Pendleton, NY
octane question
Yes Don is correct. The ratings were changed, but I also do not know the year. I believe it is safe to run 87 regular pump gas through just about any regular production Deere. I do however run 93 in my 82 Liquifire, along with Arcticcat 50:1 injection oil, although not neccesary.
Tim Kudla
73 JDX4
80 Spitfire
82 Trailfire 340
84 Trailfire 440
10 SnoPro 500
73 JDX4
80 Spitfire
82 Trailfire 340
84 Trailfire 440
10 SnoPro 500
octane question
There are two methods of measuring octane, one is called the Research Method (rm) and the other is called the Motor Method (mm). Both use a variable compression ratio single cylinder laboratory engine for the tests. One method gives a bit higher octane number than the other due to different test conditions. I don?t remember which was higher or lower. There are other methods, Aviation Method for AV gas and the Supercharged Method, neither apply to the pump gas we buy. This stuff I am pretty sure of.
Now I going far out on a limb here........ I think that the lower number of the two, Reseach vs. Motor, was used as the reported octane at the pump back in the all lead days. At the time of the switch to no-lead fuels, the reported octane at the pump became an average of the two, (rm+mm)/2. I think that I remember that change produced a small difference in the at the pump rating, somewhat higher number due to averaging in the higher test method, the method not used to report octane in the all lead days. Do any of you old timers (like me) remember seeing (rm+mm)/2 posted on the pumps at the change over to no-lead? It was posted only a few years. Maybe it was only a Michigan thing, as the Michigan Dept. of Ag sort of police the pumps here.
I hope I have not lead you too far astray. Maybe Joe (GM fuel cell engineer) can set the record straight for us.
Now I going far out on a limb here........ I think that the lower number of the two, Reseach vs. Motor, was used as the reported octane at the pump back in the all lead days. At the time of the switch to no-lead fuels, the reported octane at the pump became an average of the two, (rm+mm)/2. I think that I remember that change produced a small difference in the at the pump rating, somewhat higher number due to averaging in the higher test method, the method not used to report octane in the all lead days. Do any of you old timers (like me) remember seeing (rm+mm)/2 posted on the pumps at the change over to no-lead? It was posted only a few years. Maybe it was only a Michigan thing, as the Michigan Dept. of Ag sort of police the pumps here.
I hope I have not lead you too far astray. Maybe Joe (GM fuel cell engineer) can set the record straight for us.
- WinnipegStPaul9
- Posts: 5577
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:00 am
- Real Name: Don Amber
- Location: Churubusco, IN
octane question
Good information Guy. Thanks. DA
Feel free to check out our website www.buscobullet.com for restorations or parts.
octane question
The octain ratings came from here:
http://www.freewebs.com/thesledzone/troubleshooting.htm
If it should be changed, then I will change it.
http://www.freewebs.com/thesledzone/troubleshooting.htm
If it should be changed, then I will change it.
-
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 12:00 am
- Real Name: Pat Scott
- Location: Southeast Pa.
octane question
Regardless if the octane standards have changed from the past, JD had recommended a higher octane than standard low pump gas at the time, for the 76 cyclone, liquifire and liquidator. I would at least use the middle grade available today, not the standard regular.
'76 440 cyclone
'76 440 liquifire
'78 440 Cyclone
'75 JDX8 (sold to a member here)
'78 Liquifire(CrossCountry Clone)
'80 Liquifire(sold)
'76 440 liquifire
'78 440 Cyclone
'75 JDX8 (sold to a member here)
'78 Liquifire(CrossCountry Clone)
'80 Liquifire(sold)